Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Perhaps you have seen the photos of masterful Russian portrait photographers such as Elena Shumilova or Anka Zhuravleva. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix). I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. This allows for less aggressive camera settings for night photography such as using a lower ISO setting and shorter exposure. My copy is 12-years-old and still delivers at over 75 weddings a year. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. This is a very popular lens, and I am sure there are a ton of lens test reports for it available online. One of my very best lenses! We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. The images were collected using a Canon EOS Rebel T3i camera riding on a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. He has quite a breadth photos many of which are quite good. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count.So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. They seem to be really good for NB work. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. Film Friday: DPRTV reviews Fujifilm's Acros II film, Fujifilm launches Instax Mini 12 instant camera, DPReview March Madness, vote for your champions, Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM sample gallery (DPReview TV), OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro sample gallery, Live from Japan: Highlights from CP+ 2023, Retro Review: 24 years later, the Sony F505 is still pretty cool, Hands on with the OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro, New FAA rules make it easier for recreational drone pilots to fly in restricted US airspaces, Leica marks James Bond's 60th* with a special edition D-Lux 7, Film Friday: A closer look at the Pentax KX, an original K-mount SLR, Blackmagic Design announces a new Studio Camera 6K Pro, National Geographic selects Pictures of the Year photo contest winner, Sigma brings DC DN APS-C primes to Nikon Z-mount, Panasonic Lumix S 14-28mm F4-5.6 Macro sample gallery, Tamron announces 11-20mm F2.8 ultra-wide zoom for Fujifilm X-mount, Film Friday: DPReview TV steps back in time to shoot APS film, Finer Points: Here's an easy way to improve video autofocus, DPReview TV: One simple fix to improve video autofocus, Head-to-head: Adobe Super Resolution vs. ON1 Resize AI vs. Topaz Labs Gigapixel AI, Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. Does the bright star reflection bother you? Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 Bokeh == Visual character of the lens optics to render light and color mixing together. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! - Actually though, it's performance is so good that you really have to consider it a bargain, even at the $800-900 street price. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? I would love to see his test images. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. But you are talking more than 2x crop (cut half by width and height) and that leaves you to twice smaller resolution == quarter of the Mpix count. Hey! Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. Because it manage to do so. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. It allows to push your main subject matter into abstraction wide open and get very detailed images stopped down. I therefore reduce the aperture at the front end of the lens (as an aperture stop) by screwing in a series of step-down rings into the filter thread. . As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. This is actually worse than just plain obsession with blur. It is a heavy lens. Based on my handful of experiences with this lens in the backyard, I have found these traits to hold true. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. By far the best one is the Tiffen Haze 2 filter. I know this is a very old article but I was re reading as I mulled over this very point (85/1.4 vs 135/1.8) and I've gotta point out this math is all wrong First off 85->135 is a 1.6x crop and a 1.6x crop will yield 16MP on 42MP bodies (42 / (1.6x1.6) ), ~20MP on the A1, and ~24MP on the A7R IV. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. fast, sharp wide open, excellent bokeh, value for money, very fast, sharp, gorgeous background blur, world class lens. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Smooth but contrasty. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4. I understand the optical design is quite old. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted or otherwise used without the prior written consent of The Imaging Resource. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Review - Imaging Resource https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. I bought it for its bokeh. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). He's better than I am on BS, I got to give him that. Really like the large focusing ring. Lagoon and Trifid wide field IC1396 nebula in Cepheus - wide field image. Whats the best camera for around $2000? (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009
Grummons Funeral Home,
Hartland School Board Meeting,
Baltimore County Police Deaths,
Director Of Uscis Texas Service Center,
Articles C
